Somewhere ahead of us, science fears we will face the 'great filter', a cataclysmic event that all intelligences face and which prevents them colonising and communicating with other civilizations in the universe. Such events are common occurences in the history of life on earth. They include asteroid or planetoid impacts, radiation bursts from nearby stars, supervolcano eruptions, near misses by a massive object which changes planet orbits and more. Humans have simply been very lucky to have evolved in a relatively peaceful period of time. We can't assume we will always be so lucky though. If we are to survive as a species, we must establish colonies on different planets. Ideally these will be around different stars. That's going to require us to have a much longer lifespan and to make life secure from events like this. We need to transport all earths lifeforms to our new homes. Even what we consider harmful lifeforms may prove essential in the future.
Let's suppose a medical research team did discover a way of reversing old age and the effects of illness, effectively making people immortal. What should they do with their 'fix'?
I think you'll agree that option 1 is just simply wrong. The only way it would be successful would be for the discovery to remain a top secret. Once the knowledge got out - and it would get out - those who had benefited would be universally hated and would die at the hands of a mob probably.
Option 2 takes away the right of people to choose. There would be some who would say that this was playing god and was just wrong. Expect riots from these people; some would be quoting a verse from Genesis: 6:3: "And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years."
Another group would resent their lack of choice and would press for assisted suicide programs. Who wants to live a long and miserable life?
Can you see option 3 being popular? What if the 'fix' undid the sterilization. Would people pay to have this reversed once they were immortal?
Who chooses the 'worthy' in option 4? What if you are a worthy individual but never got a chance to prove it?
Would any doctor agree to option 5? Isn't the whole purpose of medicine to extend human life? Do people have the moral right to hide such a discovery?
The Immortality Gene story chooses option 2. If this first book in the 'A Vested Interest' series were to become reality, just what would be the effect?
Our book suggests a lifetime of 1729 years. That's not how immortality is defined by most people but assumes a human will stay healthy until killed by an accident, starvation, war, an 'Extinction Level Event' (ELE) or some other overwhelming event. According to insurance tables that would happen on average in 1729 years. (Hey - did you know my Twitter name is @JChapman1729 ?)
Back in 1982 early text only adventure games were being written for home computers. One such game was 'Castle of Riddles' written by Peter Killworth and published by Acornsoft. Now it's been re-written and greatly expanded with added images and sound. Play it on your computer, tablet or even a phone.
Check it out at https://jaydax.co.uk/corr
Immortality Gene Discovered | Science
Stem cell 'immortality' gene found | New Scientist
Biological immortality - Wikipedia
Bioengineering immortality - Understanding Genetics - TheTech.org
Hang in There: The 25-Year Wait for Immortality - Live Science
Immortality, Regenerative Medicine, and the Origin of Death - UK NHS
Immortality and Society: The Consequences of Ending Aging - Senescence.info
Is it possible? According to Aubrey de Grey, Chief Science Officer of the SENS Research Foundation, an organisation dedicated to ending ageing, the first person to live to 1,000 is probably alive now. Watch his TED talk on this subject or his interview with 'Hardtalk' at the BBC. Will it happen soon? It's already starting to take place. In 2015 a biotech company used genetic engineering to treat a woman, Liz Parrish. As a result her telomeres increased in length by 9%. That's equivalent to reversing 20 years of aging. Find out more at Bioviva. You might also like to read this 2015 technical document published. Check where it's contributors work - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acel.12344/pdf
In March 2017 research led by scientists at Harvard Medical School (HMS) revealed a critical step had been found in a molecular chain of events that allows cells to mend their broken DNA. Read the article here - https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/03/harvard-scientists-pinpoint-critical-step-in-dna-repair-cellular-aging/
Do some research and find out exactly how your DNA is damaged in such a way that it does not repair itself or destroy and replace the damaged strand. You are never going to think about diseases such as the common cold in the same way again.
Want a short story instead?
I've written a number of short time travel stories. Each is 99p/99¢ and great for taking a break from writing.
Check them out at http://iwadasn.info